The 2^nd Red Cross International Humanitarian Law Moot, Hong Kong

(28 February 2004)

 

 

                               

Name of Judge:                                                                        Courtroom:                  

 

Oral pleadings are to be scored on a scale of 50 to 100 points, consistent with the following scale  (please provide written comments, if any, on a separate paper):

50-54 = Extremely Poor;          55-64 = Very Poor;     65-74 = Poor;            75 = Average;

76-84 = Above Average;         85-89 = Good;             90-94 = Very good

95-99 = Extremely good;          100 = Excellent   

 

General elements to consider in scoring the oralists:

• Knowledge of the facts and the legal principles directly applicable to the facts.
• Proper and articulate analysis of the issues
• Knowledge and use of authorities.
• Logic and reasoning.
• Ingenuity (able to argue by analogy from related aspects of humanitarian law)
• Clarity and organisation.
• Persuasiveness                        

 

APPLICANT  Team No.                                         

 

　

First Oralist                                                                Score                         

      

 

Second Oralist                                                         Score                         ​    

                                                              

 

 

 

 

RESPONDENT Team No.                                         ​

 

                                                      

 

First Oralist                                                                Score                         ​    

 

      

 

Second Oralist                                                         Score                         ​    

        

                                                              

 

 

 

SIGNATURE:_________________________________________________________

　

Note: Scores given by the two judges of each oral hearing will be averaged to give a final score of an individual oralist.